2018-19 Spurs 10-Game Evaluation: Volume 2


Through 20 games, the San Antonio Spurs sit at .500 with a 10-10 record. Offensively, the team continues to maintain a Top-10 offense, while defensively, the Spurs are still having their issues and rank in the bottom 10 in the league. The team has added a player from injury in Derrick White to help on the perimeter, but, in the frontcourt, Pau Gasol will have missed the last 12 games due to left foot soreness.

Though it’s not clear what type of role or how much playing time he’ll receive, the Spurs will also be adding Lonnie Walker IV back to the squad soon since he’s progressing toward playing in the G-League as part of his rehab.

If you’re new to the 10-game evaluation series, here’s Volume 1. Most of the stats used in this evaluation are from CleaningTheGlass.com and on CTG, a ranking is provided for the stats. I created the following rating system based on the rankings:

Elite – Rank near Top 5

Good – Rank near Top 10

Average – Rank near 15th

Improvement – Rank near 20th

Ugh – Rank near 25th

Ouch – Rank near 30th

Now, with 20 games logged, let’s see how the Spurs are playing on both ends of the floor in a bit more detail.

Section I. Scoring

Category Volume 1 Rank Rating Volume 2 Rank Rating
Points Per 100 Possessions 111 PP/100 10th Good 110.8 PP/100 9th Good
Halfcourt Points Per Play 94.8 PP/100 9th Good 94.2 PP/100 12th Good
eFG % 50.7% 21st Improvement 51.1% 22nd Improvement
Rim Accuracy 59.6% 23rd Ugh… 61.9% 17th Average
All Mid-Range Accuracy 41.1% 11th Good 40.4% 12th Good
Corner 3PT Accuracy 43.8% 6th Elite 40.7% 8th Good
Non-Corner 3PT Accuracy 39% 3rd Elite 39.7% 1st Elite
Bench Points Per Game 39.7 points 10th Good 37.8 points 14th Average


As mentioned above, the Spurs have continued to maintain a Top-10 offense based around their mid-three of DeMar DeRozan, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Rudy Gay. Most of the data from the first 10 games to the 20-game mark has remained consistent. The team saw a slight bump in accuracy at the rim, though, there’s still some room for improvement. While they’re not a high volume 3-point shooting team, the Spurs are the most accurate in the league through 20 games from distance.

Going back to the rim accuracy where the Spurs are ranked 17th, I was eager to see how the individual core players are shooting at the rim. The data below is presented by each core player from most frequent shooter at the rim, to least. Then, the accuracy and a rating (based off the CTG percentiles and my own words) are provided.

Rim Accuracy

Player and Frequency at rim Accuracy at rim Rating
Jakob Poeltl (70%) 69% Good
LaMarcus Aldridge (40%) 62% Improvement Needed
Pau Gasol (40%) 56% Improvement Needed
Dante Cunningham (36%) 57% Improvement Needed
Derrick White (31%) 50% Improvement Needed
DeMar DeRozan (28%) 67% Good
Rudy Gay (28%) 55% Improvement Needed
Patty Mills (18%) 73% Elite
Marco Belinelli (17%) 48% Improvement Needed
Bryn Forbes (16%) 61% Good
Davis Bertans (16%) 67% Average


While most of the core players are shooting in the ‘Improvement Needed’ area, many of them don’t attack the rim that frequently. The two players I wanted to highlight though are Aldridge and Derrick White. Being one of the Spurs’ key bigs who either posts up, drives, or crashes the boards for putbacks, Aldridge’s accuracy at the rim has an impact on the team as a whole because of the number of shot attempts he takes as a go-to option. With Aldridge only making 62% of his shots at the rim, it would be the lowest accuracy for a season in his career. The lowest Aldridge has ever shot at the rim was 64% in the 2013-14 season with Portland. His career average is 67.5%.

In playing more 5 this season, Aldridge isn’t as effective against more traditional centers and certain matchups. As has been seen when he has smaller matchups, he has better production. Another reason for Aldridge’s early struggles this season are the number of double teams he’s seeing. With more double teams, he must make the 1-on-1 shot attempts he gets count that much more, and early on, he’s struggling in accuracy from all three levels of the court.

Another player to watch in rim accuracy is Derrick White. White played very well in an early injury-return game against Houston with 14 points and eight assists. After that though, his production and minutes have been like a roller coaster. He went from starting for a few games to finding himself coming off the bench and playing less than 10 minutes in certain games. He showed some strides again in the Spurs’ Monday win in Chicago with 8 points and an assist. White has the ability to run the pick-and-roll and get into the paint to either finish at the rim or find his teammates for shots.

Where do the Spurs frequently take shots from?

Area Volume 1 Rank Rating Volume 2 Rank Rating
Frequency at Rim 27.5% 30th Ouch 28.2% 29th Ouch
Frequency All Mid-Range 48% 1st Elite 46.8% 1st Elite
Frequency All Threes 24.5% 30th Ouch 25% 30th Ouch
Free Throw Rate 20.3 P/100 FGA 17th Average 20.3 P/100 FGA 15th Average


The Spurs continue to be a team that take advantage of the mid-range and their halfcourt slower play in getting to the free throw line at a league average rate. The opposite can be said for getting shots from the rim and free throw line.

Section II. Ball Movement

Category Volume 1 Rank Rating Volume 2 Rank Rating
Turnover % 11.8% 1st Elite 12% 1st Elite
Assisted Made Baskets 58.8% 14th Average 57.6% 16th Average
Passes Per Game 302.6 Passes 10th Good 292.9 Passes 13th Average
Secondary Assists Per Game 4 assists 1st Elite 3.3 assists 3rd Elite


The Spurs make the most of their possessions by not turning the ball over, but, as Grizzlies Head Coach JB Bickerstaff recently said, San Antonio has been playing a bit more isolation basketball in letting DeRozan, Aldridge, and Gay operate. This is showing in the data as the Spurs’ assisted made baskets and passes per game have each seen a decrease. The Spurs do still try to go from a good to great shot, and that is evidenced by their 3rd ranking in secondary or ‘hockey assists.’

Section III. Defense

Category Volume 1 Rank Rating Volume 2 Rank Rating
Points Per 100 Possessions 110.5 PP/100 19th Improvement 111.8 PP/100 22nd Improvement
Opp Halfcourt Points Per Play 93.8 PP/100 18th Improvement 95.5 PP/100 25th Ugh
Opp eFG% 53.5% 19th Improvement 54% 25th Ugh
Opp Offensive Rebound % 24.8% 10th Good 24.3% 5th Elite
Opp Free Throw Rate 16.5 P/100 FGA 2nd Elite 16.5 P/100 FGA 1st Elite
Opp Frequency Off Live Rebounds 34.6% 30th Ouch 31.9% 27th Ugh
Opp Points Added off Live Rebounds -0.2 PP/100 6th Elite +0.5 PP/100 8th Good


Where do opponents shoot from and how accurate are they against the Spurs’ defense?

Shot Locations Volume 1 Rank Rating Volume 2 Rank Rating
Opp Frequency at Rim 35.8% 13th Average 36.5% 18th Improvement
Opp Accuracy at Rim 61.7% 15th Average 63.6% 19th Improvement
Opp Frequency All Mid-Range 33.4% 23rd Ugh… 32.9% 21st Improvement
Opp Accuracy All Mid-Range 43% 27th Ugh… 44.3% 29th Ouch
Opp Frequency Corner 3PT 6.1% 8th Good 5.8% 5th Elite
Opp Accuracy Corner 3PT 42.1% 26th Ugh… 37% 14th Average
Opp Frequency Non-Corner 3PT 24.7% 17th Average 24.8% 14th Average
Opp Accuracy Non-Corner 3PT 36.4% 21st Ugh… 35.9% 18th Improvement


Let’s break all this data down on the Spurs’ defense into the good and the bad.

The good: The Spurs moved from good to elite in opponent offensive rebounding percentage, and seven specific players are ranked above league average in defensive rebounding percentage (Gay, Gasol, DeRozan, White, Mills, Aldridge, Cunningham). The Spurs are doing what they can to make sure second chance points don’t haunt them on the defensive end. The Spurs also continue to make sure not to put opponents on the free throw line.

The Spurs have seen growth in their 3-point defense. They showed progress in getting opponent frequency of attempts from three to come down slightly, as well as the opponent accuracy from corner threes.

The bad: The Spurs got a little worse in both points allowed per 100 possessions and in opponent effective field goal percentage. The Spurs’ transition defense is still a problem when San Antonio misses shots on offense. Teams are getting 31.9% of their transition plays off the Spurs’ misses, ranking San Antonio 27th and putting the Spurs on their heels frequently. Teams are mainly getting out in transition against the Spurs’ starters according to the data. All five of Forbes, DeRozan, Cunningham, Gay, and Aldridge see more transition plays off live rebounds compared to anyone on the bench.

This might be due to Gasol missing the last 11 games, but opponents have attacked the Spurs more at the rim and shot better at the rim, as the data shows going from game 10 to game 20. The Spurs’ rim defense went from average to improvement. While most defenses would prefer to allow opponents to shoot mid-range shots, teams are knocking down 44.3% of their mid-range looks against San Antonio, placing the Spurs’ defense 29th (ouch) in mid-range accuracy.

Next, I was eager to see where each Spurs player’s on court defensive rating would place them if they were side by side with the best defense in the league (Oklahoma City Thunder), the league average defense (Dallas Mavericks), and the worst defense in the league (Cleveland Cavaliers). Here’s what the data shows.

One sign of hope for the Spurs’ defense is that they’re just 2.5 points per 100 possessions shy of being a league average defense. At home in the AT&T Center, the Spurs are holding teams to 106.7 pp/100, ranking them 11th in home defense. On the road, they’re allowing 116 pp/100, placing them 25th in road defense. San Antonio must continue to bring that focus and communication they use at home to their road defense.

As far as the individual players, White and Gay both standout defensively. The Spurs are playing like the 8th ranked defense with White on the court and this is why White’s development and progress could be one of the keys to unlocking how much better the Spurs can get on both ends of the floor. With Gay, the Spurs are playing like a 55-win team when he’s on the court. Gay’s biggest hurdle will be health so San Antonio has to try to keep him on the court as much as possible.

Section IV. The Competition

Opponent is… Spurs Record
.500 or Above 5-6
Below .500 5-4


As written earlier this week, it’s not just the .500 and above teams the Spurs are struggling with, but the above .400 teams too. Though November will be the Spurs’ toughest month of the season due to the most road games and back-to-back sets, there’s no specific month where the Spurs have an easy path.

Section V. The Next 10

In their next 10 games, the Spurs will face the Timberwolves, Rockets, Blazers, Jazz (twice), Lakers (twice), Suns, Clippers, and Bulls.

Data gathered from CleaningTheGlass.com, NBA.com/stats, and HoopsStats.com as of 11/27/2018 at 5:00 PM CST.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here